Written By .

Is a company which has no option but to breach its contractual or other obligations due to international trade sanctions liable for the financial consequences of that breach? That issue, of huge importance to those engaged in international trade, came to the fore in a case concerning arms sales to Iran in the 1970s.

A company wholly owned by British government departments entered into contracts to sell tanks and armoured vehicles to the Iranian Ministry of Defence (MODSAF) more than 40 years ago. The contracts were terminated in 1979, in the wake of the Iranian revolution, but litigation has been ongoing in various forums ever since.

Following an arbitration hearing, an award was issued in MODSAF's favour in 2001. The company's liability was eventually crystallised at over £127 million, plus ongoing interest. It had paid into court sufficient funds to satisfy the award in full. However, there was no dispute that, given EU trade sanctions that have been in force against Iran since 2008, those funds could not be paid over to MODSAF.

Whilst the sanctions were in place, the High Court could not order enforcement of the award and an issue as to whether it was in fact enforceable in England, having been issued abroad, had yet to be decided. However, in the context of proceedings issued by MODSAF, the Court considered as a preliminary issue whether interest continued to accrue on the sums awarded whilst the sanctions held sway.

In ruling on the matter, the Court was satisfied that, on a true interpretation of EU Council Regulation 267/2012 – the instrument under which EU sanctions against Iran are currently enforced – interest ceased to be payable on the award whilst MODSAF continued to be a sanctioned entity.

The purpose of Article 38 of the Regulation was to prevent civil claims being brought against those whose performance of a contract or other obligation is impeded by the existence of the sanctions. Had the company not been prevented by the sanctions from satisfying the award, the relevant liability in respect of interest would not have arisen. MODSAF was thus precluded from enforcing the interest component of the award in respect of the sanctions period.

Dealing with foreign governments and their agencies often presents unusual issues. Contact us on 08081668860.

UK Top Tier Firm 2022 Lexcel Practice Management Standard Birmingham Law Firm of the Year for 2021 Resolution Collaborative Family Lawyer
The Law Society Accredited in Family Law Conveyancing Quality Scheme